Which statement about RIPv1 is true?

Unlock all questions

This demo includes only 20 questions. Upgrade to access hundreds of questions, flashcards, exam simulations, and disable ads.

Full question bankExam simulationsFlashcards
From $24.99Unlock all

Prepare for the Cyber Fundamentals Block 3 Test with our engaging quiz. Tackle multiple choice questions featuring hints and detailed explanations. Enhance your cyber security expertise and feel confident on exam day!

Multiple Choice

Which statement about RIPv1 is true?

Explanation:
RIPv1 operates as a distance‑vector protocol and is classful, meaning it does not advertise or rely on subnet masks in its updates. Because the subnet mask isn’t carried with routes, RIP version 1 can’t distinguish between subnets that use different masks within the same major network, so VLSM (Variable Length Subnet Mask) isn’t possible with RIPv1. Updates are sent across the local network as broadcasts (to all hosts), not as unicast to specific routers, and it does not maintain a link‑state database—that type of database is used by link‑state protocols like OSPF or IS-IS. So the true statement is that variable length subnet masking is not supported.

RIPv1 operates as a distance‑vector protocol and is classful, meaning it does not advertise or rely on subnet masks in its updates. Because the subnet mask isn’t carried with routes, RIP version 1 can’t distinguish between subnets that use different masks within the same major network, so VLSM (Variable Length Subnet Mask) isn’t possible with RIPv1. Updates are sent across the local network as broadcasts (to all hosts), not as unicast to specific routers, and it does not maintain a link‑state database—that type of database is used by link‑state protocols like OSPF or IS-IS. So the true statement is that variable length subnet masking is not supported.

More Multiple Choice Questions
Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy